Published Paper Details:

The office of the Governor in India was constitutionally designed as a neutral and apolitical institution, functioning as the nominal head of the state within a parliamentary framework. Rooted in constitutional morality and federal balance, the Governor was expected to act on the aid and advice of the Council of Ministers. However, recent political developments reveal a transformation--from a constitutional figurehead to an active political actor. This paper critically examines the erosion of constitutional neutrality by analyzing constitutional provisions, landmark judicial pronouncements, and contemporary political practices. The study highlights the increasing politicization of the Governor's office and its implications for federal harmony, democratic governance, and institutional credibility. It argues that while discretionary powers are constitutionally sanctioned, their politicized use poses challenges to ethical governance and cooperative federalism. The paper concludes with recommendations to restore neutrality, transparency, and judicial oversight.