Published Paper Details:

The Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2019 (CAA) has indeed ignited within it an ethical and also legal debate within India's constitutional framework. Citizenship is very fast-tracked specifically for Hindu, Sikh, Buddhist, Jain, Parsi, and Christian migrants from Pakistan, Bangladesh, and Afghanistan who entered India before December 31, 2014, because of religious persecution since this legislation amends the Citizenship Act of 1955. However, in the instance when they exclude certain Muslims and certain persecuted groups like Rohingya Muslims and Sri Lankan Tamils, they seriously concern the people in regard to religious discrimination, constitutional validity, and the secular character that the Indian state has. Criticism about the Act exists because of potentially violating Articles 14, 15, and 21 of the Indian Constitution since those do protect life and personal liberty, those do prohibit discrimination, and those ensure equality before any law. While the government defends entirely the Act because it addresses religious persecution in certain Islamic states in such a humanitarian manner, critics argue its quite selective inclusion of certain communities as well as countries does not classify reasonably under Article 14. The CAA has been greatly commended by people, from an ethical point of view, for protecting persecuted minorities, and it has also been strongly condemned for weakening India's pluralistic values. Public discourse and also judicial scrutiny do continue to be fueled by each of the constitutional, of the legal, and of the ethical dimensions of the CAA.