Published Paper Details:

Abstract: Section 515A of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, introduced through the 2012 amendment, restricts the jurisdiction of civil courts in matters relating to demolition and removal of unauthorized constructions under Sections 351 and 354A. The purpose of this statutory bar is to prevent delays caused by civil suits and injunctions that obstruct municipal enforcement. While the amendment strengthens administrative efficiency, judicial interpretations particularly from the Bombay High Court have emphasized that such efficiency must coexist with procedural fairness. Courts have recognized the validity of the jurisdictional bar but have insisted on compliance with principles of natural justice, including the right to notice and a reasoned order. This paper explores the legislative rationale, judicial treatment, and procedural implications of Section 515A, examining how the provision attempts to balance municipal autonomy with individual rights in cases of demolition of unauthorized structures. The analysis highlights how the judiciary has balanced public interest with individual justice, making Section 515A a pivotal and evolving area of municipal law.