Published Paper Details:

The management of mandibular fractures has evolved considerably with the advent of rigid internal fixation. This review article provides a comprehensive synthesis of the last decade of literature, comparing the use of titanium and bioresorbable plates. We examine their distinct biomechanical properties, clinical outcomes, patient-reported satisfaction, and economic implications. While titanium remains the established benchmark due to its superior mechanical strength and reliability in complex, high-stress fractures, recent evidence suggests that resorbable plates are a viable, and often superior, alternative for specific indications. The primary advantage of resorbable systems is their ability to provide temporary fixation followed by complete absorption, thereby avoiding the need for a second surgery for hardware removal. The review concludes that the optimal choice of material is not universal but must be tailored to the specific fracture type, patient demographics, and surgeon's expertise, reflecting a shift towards a more personalized approach to care.