Published Paper Details:

The novels of Jane Austen have long been celebrated for their sharp social critique, but when read through the lens of ecofeminism they reveal a deeper commentary on the dual oppression of women and the exploitation of land. In Regency England, property laws such as entailment and primogeniture reduced both women and land to commodities, controlled and circulated within patriarchal structures. Austen exposes this dynamic by showing how her heroines are positioned within these systems of possession, and how their autonomy emerges in contrast to it. Pride and Prejudice illustrate the brutal logic of entailment that disinherits the Bennet sisters, while Mansfield Park links the domestic hierarchy of women's subordination to the colonial exploitation of plantation land abroad. In Sense and Sensibility, the dispossession of the Dashwood women underscores how survival depends on male-centred inheritance, and Emma provides a rare case of female control over land, complicated by the heroine's privileged position. Across these works, gardens, walks, and natural spaces become symbolic refuges for women, representing harmony, freedom, and balance against the rigid structures of ownership. Austen's heroines may not disrupt patriarchal property laws, but they resist and negotiate them in ways that echo ecofeminist ethics of care, interdependence, and relationality. By aligning women's voices with nature, Austen critiques not only the injustices of her age but also anticipates later debates about the cultural logic that treats both women and the environment as resources to be possessed. Reading Austen ecofeministically broadens our understanding of her relevance, revealing her as a writer who subtly yet powerfully questioned the flapped politics of gender and land.