Published Paper Details:

The use of "truth serum" tests, also known as narco-analysis, has sparked considerable debate in the context of Indian legal proceedings. These tests involve administering drugs to induce a state of semi-consciousness in which a subject may be more likely to disclose information. While often perceived as a tool for extracting hidden truths, the admissibility and reliability of such tests in court remain contentious. This paper explores the legal, ethical, and constitutional challenges surrounding truth serum tests in India, particularly in light of landmark judgments by the Supreme Court and various high courts. The Constitution of India, under Article 20(3), provides protection against self-incrimination, raising concerns about the voluntary nature of such tests and their alignment with fundamental rights. Furthermore, the scientific validity of narco-analysis and its potential for coercion cast doubt on its reliability as evidence. Through a critical analysis of legal precedents and evolving jurisprudence, this paper seeks to unveil the complexities of integrating truth serum tests into India's legal framework and examines the balance between investigative necessity and safeguarding individual rights.