Published Paper Details:

The use of language in any form is immensely creative, opening out to countless probabilities of exegesis to its users but this diverse potentiality is often misconstrued when it gets employed in unimaginably destructive ways. Selecting words and investing them with poignant significations along with multiple avenues of understanding can turn it both politically personal and personally political. As is often classified a language can be either conformist or non-conformist or sometimes both together, which consequentially weighs heavily upon the word "mad" and a madman's language. The language imbued with irrational raving and nonsensical rant does indeed have an essentially poetic structure open to a number of potent decoding. Though for the world it is a lunatic language with no immanent sense of universally accepted dialectics, the insanity and the instability of the very choice of words is not so badly mad even if it is madly bad. It is indeed a rebellious and resistant version of alternative linguistic model which is not normative of course but for that matter it cannot be turned down and something silly and negligible to use Bakhtinian model of communicative tempo that a language is gifted with and capable of, at least a lunatic is not silent nor is he silenced, nor can he be silenced.