Journal IJCRT UGC-CARE, UGCCARE( ISSN: 2320-2882 ) | UGC Approved Journal | UGC Journal | UGC CARE Journal | UGC-CARE list, New UGC-CARE Reference List, UGC CARE Journals, International Peer Reviewed Journal and Refereed Journal, ugc approved journal, UGC CARE, UGC CARE list, UGC CARE list of Journal, UGCCARE, care journal list, UGC-CARE list, New UGC-CARE Reference List, New ugc care journal list, Research Journal, Research Journal Publication, Research Paper, Low cost research journal, Free of cost paper publication in Research Journal, High impact factor journal, Journal, Research paper journal, UGC CARE journal, UGC CARE Journals, ugc care list of journal, ugc approved list, ugc approved list of journal, Follow ugc approved journal, UGC CARE Journal, ugc approved list of journal, ugc care journal, UGC CARE list, UGC-CARE, care journal, UGC-CARE list, Journal publication, ISSN approved, Research journal, research paper, research paper publication, research journal publication, high impact factor, free publication, index journal, publish paper, publish Research paper, low cost publication, ugc approved journal, UGC CARE, ugc approved list of journal, ugc care journal, UGC CARE list, UGCCARE, care journal, UGC-CARE list, New UGC-CARE Reference List, UGC CARE Journals, ugc care list of journal, ugc care list 2020, ugc care approved journal, ugc care list 2020, new ugc approved journal in 2020, ugc care list 2021, ugc approved journal in 2021, Scopus, web of Science.
How start New Journal & software Book & Thesis Publications

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CREATIVE RESEARCH THOUGHTS - IJCRT (IJCRT.ORG)

International Peer Reviewed & Refereed Journals, Open Access Journal

IJCRT Peer-Reviewed (Refereed) Journal as Per New UGC Rules.

ISSN Approved Journal No: 2320-2882 | Impact factor: 7.97 | ESTD Year: 2013

Call For Paper - Volume 14 | Issue 3 | Month- March 2026

Scholarly open access journals, Peer-reviewed, and Refereed Journals, Impact factor 7.97 (Calculate by google scholar and Semantic Scholar | AI-Powered Research Tool) , Multidisciplinary, Monthly, Indexing in all major database & Metadata, Citation Generator, Digital Object Identifier(CrossRef DOI)

Submit Your Paper
Login to Author Home
Communication Guidelines

WhatsApp Contact
Click Here

  Published Paper Details:

  Paper Title

A STUDY ON THE COMPARISON OF HEMODYNAMIC RESPONSES TO THE INSERTION USING LMA(CLASSIC) AND LMA (PROSEAL) IN THE PATIENTS UNDERGOING LOWER ABDOMINAL AND PERINEAL SURGERIES

  Authors

  Mehak Aziz Mir,  Dr. Umar Farooq,  Dr.Abhishek Gupta,  Dr. Pankaj Kaul,  Mr. Ishfaq Ramzan

  Keywords

Laryngeal Mask Airway , lower abdominal, perineal surgeries. General anaesthesia,

  Abstract


General anesthesia is a medically induced state of unconsciousness, characterized by lack of pain sensation (analgesia), immobility, muscle relaxation, and amnesia. It is used during the surgical procedures to ensure that the patient does not experience pain and does not remember the surgery. On October 16, 1846, William T. G. Morton successfully demonstrated the use of ether as an anaesthetic at the Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston. This event is often considered the public debut of surgical anesthesia. (Miller RD and Eriksson L I., 2009). Importance of airway management is crucial during general anesthesia to ensure that adequate ventilation and oxygenation is maintained throughout the procedure. Without proper airway management, there is a risk of hypoxia (lack of oxygen), hypercapnia (excess carbon dioxide), and potential airway obstruction, which can lead to severe complications, including brain damage and death. The primary goal of airway management is to maintain an open airway to facilitate the gas exchange. According to the American Society of Anaesthesiologist' s guidelines, this involves techniques ranging from simple face masks to the advanced procedures like endotracheal intubation and the use of supraglottic devices. During general anesthesia, the protective airway reflexes are suppressed, increasing the risk of the aspiration of the gastric contents into the lungs. Proper airway management includes the use of endotracheal tubes to prevent potentially life- threatening complications. (Brady K et al., 2013). SAD have gained popularity in the anaesthetic practice due to their several advantages over the ETT. These advantages include the ease of use, reduced trauma, and lower incidence of certain complications. SAD are generally easier and quicker to insert as compared to the ETT especially in the cases where endotracheal intubation may be challenging. This can be particularly beneficial in emergency situations or for the practitioners with less experience in the advanced airway management. The insertion of SAD typically results in less trauma to the airway as compared to the ETT. This is because supraglottic airway device do not pass through the vocal cords, thus reducing the risk of damage to these structures. This leads to fewer postoperative complications such as sore throat, hoarseness, and injury to the airway. (Patel B and Bhattacharya P., 2014). SAD are generally better tolerated by the patients during the emergence from anesthesia. This can result in a smoother recovery phase and a reduction in coughing and agitation upon waking. (Brimacombe J et al., 2002). The LMA Classic and LMA ProSeal are both supraglottic airway devices typically utilized in anesthesia practice to facilitate air flow and keep the airway open at some point. Both LMA Classic and LMA ProSeal are valuable gears in anesthesia exercise, imparting alternatives tailored to unique surgical necessities. The preference among them relies upon the elements such as the nature of the surgical procedure, patient condition, and airway control. (Evan NR and Efrat et al., 2002). Supraglottic airway devices have revolutionized the airway management in the anesthesia practice by offering advantages such as ease of insertion, reduced risk of airway injury, and maintenance of a clear airway during surgery. Among these devices, the laryngeal mask airway is one of the most commonly used, SAD with versions like the LMA Classic and LMA ProSeal designed to improve the airway seal and reduce the risk of aspiration. The LMA-Classic, introduced in the late 1980s, quickly gained popularity due to its ease of use, rapid insertion, and lower incidence of airway trauma. However, the development of the LMA- ProSeal, with its dual lumen design and enhanced sealing capabilities, promised to address some of the limitations of its predecessor, such as the risk of aspiration and inadequate ventilation. (Chauhan G et al., 2013).

  IJCRT's Publication Details

  Unique Identification Number - IJCRT2408337

  Paper ID - 267513

  Page Number(s) - d88-d93

  Pubished in - Volume 12 | Issue 8 | August 2024

  DOI (Digital Object Identifier) -   

  Publisher Name - IJCRT | www.ijcrt.org | ISSN : 2320-2882

  E-ISSN Number - 2320-2882

  Cite this article

  Mehak Aziz Mir,  Dr. Umar Farooq,  Dr.Abhishek Gupta,  Dr. Pankaj Kaul,  Mr. Ishfaq Ramzan,   "A STUDY ON THE COMPARISON OF HEMODYNAMIC RESPONSES TO THE INSERTION USING LMA(CLASSIC) AND LMA (PROSEAL) IN THE PATIENTS UNDERGOING LOWER ABDOMINAL AND PERINEAL SURGERIES", International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts (IJCRT), ISSN:2320-2882, Volume.12, Issue 8, pp.d88-d93, August 2024, Available at :http://www.ijcrt.org/papers/IJCRT2408337.pdf

  Share this article

  Article Preview

  Indexing Partners

indexer
indexer
indexer
indexer
indexer
indexer
indexer
indexer
indexer
indexer
indexer
indexer
indexer
indexer
indexer
indexer
indexer
indexer
indexer
Call For Paper March 2026
Indexing Partner
ISSN and 7.97 Impact Factor Details


ISSN
ISSN
ISSN: 2320-2882
Impact Factor: 7.97 and ISSN APPROVED
Journal Starting Year (ESTD) : 2013
ISSN
ISSN and 7.97 Impact Factor Details


ISSN
ISSN
ISSN: 2320-2882
Impact Factor: 7.97 and ISSN APPROVED
Journal Starting Year (ESTD) : 2013
ISSN
DOI Details

Providing A digital object identifier by DOI.org How to get DOI?
For Reviewer /Referral (RMS) Earn 500 per paper
Our Social Link
Open Access
This material is Open Knowledge
This material is Open Data
This material is Open Content
Indexing Partner

Scholarly open access journals, Peer-reviewed, and Refereed Journals, Impact factor 7.97 (Calculate by google scholar and Semantic Scholar | AI-Powered Research Tool) , Multidisciplinary, Monthly, Indexing in all major database & Metadata, Citation Generator, Digital Object Identifier(DOI)

indexer
indexer
indexer
indexer
indexer
indexer
indexer
indexer
indexer
indexer
indexer
indexer
indexer
indexer
indexer
indexer
indexer
indexer
indexer
indexer
indexer
indexer
indexer
indexer
indexer
indexer
indexer
indexer
indexer
indexer
indexer
indexer
indexer