Published Paper Details:

Democratic decentralisation reshaped our country's administration. Andhra Pradesh is a district which was under various amendments from history till now. Recently in 2014, Telangana and Andhra were officially said to be different states, even though they have the same language but why was it proclaimed to be? During British rule, a major part of Andhra came under British rule in the Madras Presidency which was acquired from the Nizam but still, the Telangana region remained under Nizam's domination of Hyderabad. The infrastructure and development were different but after the independence, It was the end of British and Nizam rule, Telangana region merged with Andhra Pradesh and the rest to Karnataka and Maharashtra. But this form of decentralisation didn't work well because of some disparities. Andhra region was directly ruled by the British so their development and education level were high compared to Telangana. Even, they had cultural differences as the Telangana region was influenced by north India. So as their standards are not equal, due to the difference in earlier decentralisation. To make inequality equal, we need to practice inequality in the distribution of resources, so all people could get equal opportunity. Now again India has redrawn the internal boundaries for better democratic decentralisation to be provided by the central government. In this paper, we could understand the merits and demerits of democratic decentralisation in all the 3 cases of British and Nizam's rule, together, and separate states such as Telangana and Andhra Pradesh. And understand the administration and find the best alternative among them.