Published Paper Details:

This study aims to completely equate conventional actual, bacterial factual, and bacterial concrete combining fly ash as an additional cementitious material. We will judge each material based on substance, stamina, and self-curative capabilities, referring to practices or policies that do not negatively affect environmental impact, and cost-influence. Concrete samples will be arranged using normal join designs, accompanying bacterial strains for calcium carbonate precipitation, and accompanying fly ash as a prejudiced substitute for cement. We will analyze compressive substances and evaluate self-healing through being able to be seen with eye notes and microscopy. Referring practices or policies that do not negatively affect environmental impact will be evaluated by resolving element emissions, strength devouring, and resource exercise, accompanying cost reasonings for economic practicability. The verdicts will inform tenable creation practices, providing insights into reinforcing actual performance and endurance while underrating material impact.