Published Paper Details:

The study's goal was to find out how well the cardiac rehabilitation plan worked on activity tolerance, certain physiological parameters (heart rate (HR) and electrocardiogram (ECG)), and quality of life in Dr. Prem Hospital Panipat patients who had recently undergone CABG surgery. This study's main ideas come from Sister Calista Roy's Adaptation Model, which is made up of four ideas: the person, nursing, health, and surroundings. Methodology: To test a goal, a quantitative research method is used. This study uses a quasi-experimental research design to find out how well a cardiac rehabilitation plan works. It does this by using a quasi-experimental nonequivalent Pretest Post Test control group design. The study took place at Dr. Prem Hospital. For the study, 60 people who had CABG surgery were chosen: 30 were in the experimental group and 30 were in the control group. They were all brought to the cardiothoracic surgery department. The study used a method called "total enumerative sampling." Demographic and clinical variables, the Duke Activity Status Index, heart rate, an ECG, and the SF 36 questionnaire are all used to gather data. Also, written permission was asked for. The method used was total enumerative selection. This cardiac rehabilitation scheme checked in on people who had CABG surgery once a week. On the fifth day after surgery, both the experimental group and the control group took a pre-test in the post-operative room of the cardiothoracic department. Thirty of them were put in the training group and thirty were put in the control group. The intervention group got cardiac rehabilitation for three days in a row through a planned training programme and demonstration. They were told what to do and were urged to do it over the phone. Before 30 and 60 days, changes were measured in both groups' exercise tolerance, physiological parameters (heart rate ECG), and quality of life. The standardised tools were used, and the material was approved by experts. The Cronbach alpha method was used to check the reliability of the tools. Before the samples were used to collect data, the Duke activity status index was used to measure activity tolerance and the SF-36 questionnaire was used to measure quality of life. For heart rate.9, the inter rater method ECG-.75 was used. The control group had an activity tolerance score of 45.47 + 4.883 on the post-test, which is the mean and standard deviation. The average and range of exercise tolerance levels in the control group during the post-test were 25.23 + 8.169, and the score for the independent 't' test was 12.045 for 58 degrees of freedom. The 'p' number was less than 0.001, which means it was probably real. To compare the experimental group and the control group, the quality of life score after the test was 50.4 + 9.676 for the experimental group and 30.8 + 5.372 for the control group. The independent 't' test score was 9.700 for the degree of freedom 58. At a 'p' value of less than 0.001, it was statistically significant(p value less than 0.001). Based on the study, it can be said that a mix of interventions, such as teaching, showing exercises, giving out pamphlets about cardiac rehabilitation, and phone calls to encourage people to stick with it can increase adherence to cardiac rehabilitation, which in turn improves activity tolerance and quality of life.People who went through a cardiac rehabilitation course will not get sick again or have to go back to the hospital.It makes people more likely to follow through with their therapy treatment.