Published Paper Details:

Both Post feminism and Third Wave Feminism emerged from 1970s feminist theory, expanding upon and challenging certain concepts. A central point of contention addressed by postfeminists and third wave feminists revolves around the concept of identity. While Second Wave feminists perceived identity as fixed and stable, emphasizing shared experiences, other philosophical and cultural movements questioned the notion of a stable, fixed identity and subjecthood. The incorporation of these ideas into feminism gained urgency as feminism evolved from a purely political movement to a comprehensive cultural theory or set of theories. Post feminism adopted the idea of a fluid and shifting identity, arguing that an emphasis on collective action could generate internal strains by neglecting differences, initially of class and color, and ultimately of identity. Third Wave feminism engages with post feminism on the topic of identity but asserts that collectivism remains relevant, as women have yet to attain complete freedom. Third Wavers contend that Post feminism leans towards competitive individualism, overlooking the various ways women experience fear, violence, and political and economic underprivilege. Texts from the Third Wave, such as Third Wave Agenda, Manifesta, and Colonize This! grapple with women's intersectional identities and call for an end to all forms of oppression. This paper aims to analyze the ideological premises and differences between these two feminist strands in constructing gender and identity. Seminal works from both strands will be scrutinized to highlight the opposition between their sources and mechanisms, contributing to the construction of a coherent version of feminism.