Published Paper Details:

The quest for alternative paradigms aimed at expanding epistemic knowledge while analyzing political challenges in the twenty-first century is motivated by limitations inherent in classic orientations of political phenomenon analysis. Modern philosophers have embraced behavioralist techniques in opposition to institutionalist, pluralist, and elitist approaches that are now in use. These approaches have the potential to elevate the empirical status of knowledge in modern political analysis. This paper's topic was examined through an examination of all available literature, debates, and archive sources using the conventional philosophical technique of analysis. In order to pinpoint the advantage that the behavioral method provides modern political scientists, the research objectively assesses the majority of the accusations leveled against it. The study comes to the conclusion that not all of the approach's examples are bad in spite of these objections. We are all becoming behaviorists as a result of the new ideas, advanced analytical tools, and mathematical models that behaviorism has given out.