Published Paper Details:

The process of making medical decisions frequently entails intricate ethical predicaments that necessitate careful contemplation and moral resolution. The paper commences by providing a comprehensive elucidation of the idea of reflective equilibrium, along with its historical evolution as a prominent method employed in the realms of moral and political philosophy. The use of reflective equilibrium in medical decision-making is then shown through detailed case studies of ethical dilemmas that often come up in healthcare settings. The aforementioned case studies encompass a diverse array of circumstances, including but not limited to end-of-life care, organ transplantation, resource allocation in times of pandemics, assisted reproductive technologies, and the issue of informed consent within clinical trials. This paper investigates the process of comparing and evaluating intuitions in relation to known ethical principles, including autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice, in order to reach a state of reflective equilibrium. This paper critically evaluates the benefits and limits associated with the application of reflective equilibrium in the field of medical ethics. Furthermore, this research examines the importance of attaining reflective equilibrium in the context of medical decision-making, highlighting its capacity to provide healthcare professionals and policymakers with a clear and coherent framework for addressing ethical challenges. In summary, the utilization of reflective equilibrium in the context of medical decision-making offers a potentially fruitful approach for addressing intricate ethical quandaries.