Published Paper Details:

The research paper aims to study the trend taken by the Judiciary in analysing the terminology Right to life and personal liberty and the depth of the interpretation taken by it in analysis of it .The research paper tends to address the point as to whether narrow or broad interpretation has been favoured by the judiciary in its decision. Further, the research paper tends to analyse the difference in the interpretation by the courts by adopting a comparative approach between countries of UK, USA and India. Further, the research paper will deal with the contemporary framework adopted by the Indian judiciary in current scenario in further giving meaning to the existence and the scope of the Article 21. The objective of the research paper is to understand the judicial trend in giving more meaning and depth to Right to Life and Personal Liberty and the objective also tends to focus on the comparative framework by adopting a study of three countries to find out the difference between them so as to analyse the scope of Article 21. Moreover, the objective also lies in studying the judicial approach in current context, the manner adopted by the courts to realise the significance of rights of the individuals which will in turn help in understanding the significance of Article 21.