ISSN2320-2882
Impact Factor9.17
UGC ParametersAligned
Low Cost₹1501 / $59
CrossRefDOI
ESTD2013
Peer ReviewTransparent
AccessOpen
Submission: Always Open

Paper Title

Learning in the Age of AI: An Empirical Analysis of Student Perspectives on Generative Tools

Authors

Muzammil Mehboob Khan

Keywords

Generative AI, Higher Education, Student Perspectives, Academic Integrity, Pedagogy , Artificial Intelligence, Educational Technology , ChatGPT , AI Literacy ,Student Ethics

Abstract

The advent of generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) has initiated a profound paradigm shift in higher education. This study investigates student perspectives on these transformative tools, analyzing their adoption, application, and perceived impact on traditional learning processes. This research employed a quantitative, cross-sectional survey design, collecting 56 responses from students at Mumbai University to capture their perceptions and self-reported behaviors. The methodology involved descriptive statistical analysis and an inferential Chi-square test to explore associations between academic disciplines and AI usage frequency. Key findings indicate a high rate of AI adoption, with 62.5% of students using these tools at least "several times a week." Students primarily use AI for cognitive augmentation, such as 'Explaining complex concepts' (60.7%), rather than simple task automation. The data reveals a significant "Efficiency-Integrity Paradox": while students overwhelmingly agree that AI enhances learning efficiency ($M = 4.30$ on a 5-point scale), they simultaneously express high agreement with 'worry' that over-reliance 'might weaken critical thinking skills' ($M = 3.95$). Furthermore, the adoption of AI is measurably altering traditional study habits, with 30.4% of students reporting a decrease in consultations with professors. This trend is occurring within a significant "guidance vacuum," as 55.4% of students report their university has provided "No, there are no guidelines" for AI use. These findings culminate in an urgent call for Mumbai University to develop clear, co-designed AI policies and integrate mandatory ethical AI literacy into the curriculum to navigate the complex challenges and opportunities of this new academic era.

How To Cite

Choose the style your journal or department asks for, then copy it. Every version below is generated from this paper's own record.

IJCRT — journal style
"Learning in the Age of AI: An Empirical Analysis of Student Perspectives on Generative Tools", IJCRT - International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts (www.ijcrt.org), ISSN:2320-2882, Vol.13, Issue 11, page no.c634-c652, November 2025, Available :https://ijcrt.org/papers/IJCRT2511340.pdf
APA — 7th edition
Khan, M. M. (2025). Learning in the Age of AI: An Empirical Analysis of Student Perspectives on Generative Tools. International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts, 13(11), c634-c652. https://ijcrt.org/viewpaperforall.php?paper=IJCRT2511340
MLA — 9th edition
Khan, Muzammil Mehboob. "Learning in the Age of AI: An Empirical Analysis of Student Perspectives on Generative Tools." International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts, vol. 13, no. 11, 2025, pp. c634-c652, https://ijcrt.org/viewpaperforall.php?paper=IJCRT2511340.
Chicago — 17th, bibliography
Khan, Muzammil Mehboob. "Learning in the Age of AI: An Empirical Analysis of Student Perspectives on Generative Tools." International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts 13, no. 11 (2025): c634-c652. https://ijcrt.org/viewpaperforall.php?paper=IJCRT2511340.
Harvard — author–date
Khan, M.M. (2025) 'Learning in the Age of AI: An Empirical Analysis of Student Perspectives on Generative Tools', International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts, 13(11), pp. c634-c652. Available at: https://ijcrt.org/viewpaperforall.php?paper=IJCRT2511340
IEEE — numbered reference
M. M. Khan, "Learning in the Age of AI: An Empirical Analysis of Student Perspectives on Generative Tools," IJCRT, vol. 13, no. 11, pp. c634-c652, Nov. 2025.
Vancouver — biomedical
Khan MM. Learning in the Age of AI: An Empirical Analysis of Student Perspectives on Generative Tools. IJCRT. 2025 Nov;13(11):c634-c652.
AMA — 11th edition
Khan MM. Learning in the Age of AI: An Empirical Analysis of Student Perspectives on Generative Tools. IJCRT. 2025;13(11):c634-c652. Accessed at https://ijcrt.org/viewpaperforall.php?paper=IJCRT2511340
BibTeX — Zotero, Mendeley, LaTeX
@article{IJCRT2511340, author = {Muzammil Mehboob Khan}, title = {Learning in the Age of AI: An Empirical Analysis of Student Perspectives on Generative Tools}, journal = {International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts}, volume = {13}, number = {11}, pages = {c634-c652}, year = {2025}, month = {November}, issn = {2320-2882}, url = {https://ijcrt.org/viewpaperforall.php?paper=IJCRT2511340} }
RIS — EndNote, RefWorks
TY - JOUR AU - Khan, Muzammil Mehboob TI - Learning in the Age of AI: An Empirical Analysis of Student Perspectives on Generative Tools T2 - International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts JA - IJCRT VL - 13 IS - 11 PY - 2025 SN - 2320-2882 UR - https://ijcrt.org/viewpaperforall.php?paper=IJCRT2511340 SP - c634-c652 ER -

Issue

Volume 13 Issue 11, November-2025
Pages : c634-c652

Article Information

Pages
c634-c652
Published
November 2025
Registration ID
IJCRT_296234
Published Paper ID
IJCRT2511340
Research Area
Social Science All
Author Type
Indian Author
Location
Dombivli, Maharashtra, India
Licence
CC BY 4.0 · Open Access
ISSN & Impact Factor
2320-2882 · IF 9.17
Downloads
168

Summarise this Paper with AI

Opens your assistant with a prepared prompt. AI summaries can be incomplete or wrong — read the full paper before citing it.

Share This Article

Author Services

Certificates, printed copies and official reports for this paper

Published authors can request a hard copy of their certificate or of the printed journal, and obtain the transparent peer review and plagiarism reports for this article — each issued against this paper’s registration record.

Registration ID IJCRT_296234

About Publisher

International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts Published by IJCRT Publication
2320-2882 ISSN
9.17 Impact Factor
2013 ESTD Year
Open Access
Impact Factor 9.17, calculated from Google Scholar citation data — see how it is worked out.
An international scholarly open access journal: peer-reviewed, refereed, multidisciplinary, monthly and multilingual, with Crossref DOI registration, rich metadata and a citation generator. Verified indexing & discovery records.
IJCRT is a Transparent, Peer-Reviewed, Open Access Journal (Refereed Journal). Following the discontinuation of UGC and UGC-CARE journal listing, IJCRT is aligned with UGC’s Suggested Parameters for Choosing Peer-Reviewed Journals. UGC Public Notice

Licence

© 2025 — Authors hold the copyright of this article. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License and The Open Definition. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
 Disclaimer: The content, data and findings in this article are based on the authors’ research and have been peer-reviewed for academic purposes only. Readers are advised to verify all information before practical or commercial use. The journal and its editorial board are not liable for any errors, losses or consequences arising from its use.

Declarations

Funding

No external funding was received for this study.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the reviewers and the editorial board of International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts for their careful reading and constructive comments, and all colleagues who supported the preparation of this manuscript.

About the Journal
9.17Impact Factor UGC AlignedSuggested Parameters TransparentPeer Review
Open AccessNo Paywall
CrossrefDOI Available
Monthly12 Issues / Year
Since 2013Established
2320-2882ISSN

Article Impact

41Views
27Downloads
68Total reads
Nov 2025Published
Published · 338 days ago Today · last read today
68 TOTAL
Views 41Downloads 27
66%
Readers who went on to take the PDF
Abstract views41
PDF downloads27

2.0 views and 1.3 downloads per day over 21 days counted.

Counts exclude identified crawler traffic and repeat hits from the same reader within 30 minutes. Downloads reached directly through a search engine or an existing citation link are not included, so the figure is a conservative count of activity through this site. Full statistics

Discovery & Indexing

Find this paper on search engines and scholarly indexes, and check the journal’s verified records.

Find this paperSearch
  • Google ScholarExact-title search, with citing articles once indexed.Search
  • CrossrefMetadata search across all Crossref records.Search
  • Semantic ScholarAI-powered literature search.Search
  • BASEBielefeld Academic Search Engine — open-access harvester.Search
  • ResearchGateResearch network publication search.Search

“Search” opens a live search for this paper; “Verified” opens a journal record checked on the Indexing & Discovery page. Third-party services index at their own discretion, often several weeks after publication.

Research & Publication Timeline
Indexed, Abstracted & Author Benefits
Just ₹1501
Publish in a UGC CARE Approved Journal | Low Cost ₹1501 Indian Author | 🌐 $59 USD International
CrossRef DOI Google Scholar Transparent Review ISSN Registered 1–2 Days UGC CARE
Submit Paper →